2017
DOI: 10.15282/ijsecs.3.2017.3.0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Single-Path and Multipath Manets Routing Protocols for Dense and Sparse Topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, authors concluded that when the network load tolerance is not considered exclusively AOMDV is better on demand routing protocol than AODV. Since it provide better packet delivery and less no of packet dropped .But it increases high overhead than AODV .Mohammed A. Mahdi et al [10] have analyzed the performance of CBRP, AODV and DSR in dense and sparse topology. They realized that CBRP protocol is better than AODV and DSR under dense topology with better packet delivery and less routing load when traffic sources are more than 20.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, authors concluded that when the network load tolerance is not considered exclusively AOMDV is better on demand routing protocol than AODV. Since it provide better packet delivery and less no of packet dropped .But it increases high overhead than AODV .Mohammed A. Mahdi et al [10] have analyzed the performance of CBRP, AODV and DSR in dense and sparse topology. They realized that CBRP protocol is better than AODV and DSR under dense topology with better packet delivery and less routing load when traffic sources are more than 20.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routing protocols are an important part of any network. They play the main role for any communication in the network and they are used to establish and correct efficient routes among a pair of network nodes and to deliver messages in a timely manner [3][4][5]. Routing protocols in MANETs are differentiated in terms of hop-by-hop or source routing, reactive or proactive approach, single path or multipath, distance vector or link state, and unicast or multicast [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%