Performance Evaluation of Polar Coded Filtered OFDM for Low Latency Wireless Communications

NOMA-NR-FOFDM Performance Enhancement-Based Sub-band Filtering

“…7 that all the proposed waveforms enhanced the spectrum localization and bandwidth efficiency as compared with NOMA-NR-OFDM. As compared with the PSD results achieved in [11,13], Fig. 7 proves that the obtained results outperform those achieved in previous works.…”

“…The authors in [11] considered a combination of a polar encoder with FOFDM to meet the 5G requirements. They evaluate the system simulation results over an additive white gaussian noise (AWGN) channel in terms of BER, error vector magnitude (EVM), and peak-to-average-power-ratio (PAPR) as a comparison with polar-coded OFDM.…”

“…However, most of the above literature constrains using the FOFDM technique to meet the 5G requirements. The authors in [11] & [13] made their design analysis for single-user transmission, i.e., they did not consider a multiple access technique. While [15] & [16] included a breakdown of all the candidate waveforms for the 5G system, the authors recommended FOFDM as the best waveform among all contenders.…”

“…To overcome these drawbacks, there are several alternative candidate waveforms for upcoming wireless systems, such as FOFDM, generalized frequency division multiplexing (GFDM), universal filtered multicarrier (UFMC), and filter bank multi-carrier (FBMC). The filter design plays an effective role in these techniques [11,12]. Among these MCM techniques, FOFDM is the best candidate waveform for B5G air interface due to many reasons.…”