2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2009.5401918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of PETbox: A low cost bench top PET scanner dedicated to high throughput preclinical imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2007, Kao achieved tomographic reconstruction on dual-panel configuration using accurately computed system response matrix, making panel PET realizable [23]. In 2009, the PETbox system was proposed to provide a compact and low cost panel PET solution [24,25]. Both systems are intended for small animal imaging, while Kao's dual-head panel PET obtained an isotropic spatial resolution of 1.2 mm [12].…”
Section: Jinst 8 P04001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, Kao achieved tomographic reconstruction on dual-panel configuration using accurately computed system response matrix, making panel PET realizable [23]. In 2009, the PETbox system was proposed to provide a compact and low cost panel PET solution [24,25]. Both systems are intended for small animal imaging, while Kao's dual-head panel PET obtained an isotropic spatial resolution of 1.2 mm [12].…”
Section: Jinst 8 P04001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent results show that by using efficient reconstruction algorithms a static PET can provide satisfactory tomographic images, allowing 3D kinetic studies [38,39].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, over the past ten years, with the rapid growth in the number of small animal imaging studies, the diversity of preclinical imaging studies that are performed with planar PET systems got wider. There cost of a planar PET got progressively lower [5,38], so more research groups could afford one, while the quality of the scanners got improved [5,39,40]. This steep rise on the popularity of the planar geometry brought only recently an appropriate testing protocol [41,42].…”
Section: Dual Head Pet Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%