2001
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of new steel frame buildings for seismic loads

Abstract: SUMMARYThe damage observed after the Northridge Earthquake exposed a weakness of design and construction procedures and led to the development of performance-based guidelines for design of new steel frame structures. As part of Phase 2 of the FEMA=SAC project, this study focused on performance prediction of new steel special moment resisting frame buildings assumed to be built after the Northridge earthquake. A total of 26 post-Northridge buildings that represent typical steel SMRF buildings based on the new s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate our methodology, we will perform IDA for a centreline model of a 9-storey steel-moment resisting frame designed for Los Angeles according to the 1997 NEHRP provisions (Lee & Foutch, 2002). The model incorporates ductile members, shear panels and realistically fracturing Reduced Beam Section connections, while it includes the influence of interior gravity columns and a first-order treatment of global geometric nonlinearities (P-∆ effects).…”
Section: Ida Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate our methodology, we will perform IDA for a centreline model of a 9-storey steel-moment resisting frame designed for Los Angeles according to the 1997 NEHRP provisions (Lee & Foutch, 2002). The model incorporates ductile members, shear panels and realistically fracturing Reduced Beam Section connections, while it includes the influence of interior gravity columns and a first-order treatment of global geometric nonlinearities (P-∆ effects).…”
Section: Ida Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, condition (19), depending on its fulfilment or not, can be used to discern if the second plastic hinge develops in the left "dog-bone" or in the intermediate beam section.…”
Section: Location Of First Plastic Hingementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These damages were mainly due to the failure of welded beam-to-column connections. For these *Address correspondence to this author at the University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, Fisciano (SA), Italy; Tel: +39 098 963421; Fax: +39 089968764; E-mail: r.montuori@unisa.it reasons ARBED waived any licensing fees and claims and RBS connections started to be investigated by a lot of researchers [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of investigators have conducted nonlinear response history analyses of steel moment resisting frames (MacRae et al, 1990;Krawinkler, 1999, 2000;Medina and Krawinkler, 2003;Zareian and Krawinkler, 2007, Luco and Cornell, 2000, Lee and Foutch, 2000, 2002aLignos and Krawinkler, 2009). As part of the SAC project, Luco and Cornell (2000) and Lee and Foutch (2002b) assessed the effects of brittle connection fractures on the behavior of archetype steel moment resisting frame structures ranging in height from 2-to 20-stories, with pre-Northridge connections, at various levels of ground motion intensity.…”
Section: A52 Structural System Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown both analytically Zareian and Krawinkler, 2007;Lignos and Krawinkler, 2009) and experimentally (Lignos et al, 2010(Lignos et al, , 2011dSuita et al, 2008) that the capping point is critical for assessing the collapse potential of moment resisting frames Lignos and Krawinkler, 2009;Lignos et al, 2011a). Lee and Foutch (2002a) concluded that all of the buildings with postNorthridge connections showed a high capacity-to-demand ratio ranging from 2.0 to 4.0, depending on frame configuration and height. As a result, it was decided that post-Northridge connections should exhibit good performance in future seismic events.…”
Section: A52 Structural System Performancementioning
confidence: 99%