2008
DOI: 10.1109/titb.2007.899497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Neural Network and Linear Predictors for Near-Lossless Compression of EEG Signals

Abstract: This paper presents a comparison of the performances of neural network and linear predictors for near-lossless compression of EEG signals. Three neural network predictors, namely, single-layer perceptron (SLP), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and Elman network (EN), and two linear predictors, namely, autoregressive model (AR) and finite-impulse response filter (FIR) are used. For all the predictors, uniform quantization is applied on the residue signals obtained as the difference between the original and the pred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Single-channel EEG compression is widely studied, and can be categorized under lossless, near-lossless, and lossy methods (see [8] and references therein). Predictive-based coders are competitive in lossless [9] and near-lossless [10,11] scenarios, but they do not support progressive transmission and hence they are of little use in practical scenarios. Combining progressive transmission and guaranteed maximum distortion (in L ∞ sense) will be crucial in real-time transmission and clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-channel EEG compression is widely studied, and can be categorized under lossless, near-lossless, and lossy methods (see [8] and references therein). Predictive-based coders are competitive in lossless [9] and near-lossless [10,11] scenarios, but they do not support progressive transmission and hence they are of little use in practical scenarios. Combining progressive transmission and guaranteed maximum distortion (in L ∞ sense) will be crucial in real-time transmission and clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sriraam et al present a number of recent papers on EEG compression using neural networks [24], [25]. In both papers, the authors make use of predictors as part of an approach to give near-lossless compression of EEG data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many excellent compression techniques for single-channel EEG compression have been reported so far, which can be categorized under lossless [2]- [5], near-lossless [6,7] and lossy methods [8]- [13]. Prediction-based coders are very competitive in lossless [4] and near-lossless scenarios [6,7], when the δ is small (typically 1 or 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction-based coders are very competitive in lossless [4] and near-lossless scenarios [6,7], when the δ is small (typically 1 or 2). However, none of the aforementioned predictive coding techniques supports progressive transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%