2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/smartgridcomm.2011.6102300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of MAC backoff algorithm in Narrowband PLC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last case is the most robust and therefore the PHY datarate is near 1 Mbit/s. However the last case may be the realistic for the smart grid, where short packets are used [7] [8]. The calculated PHY datarates are correct for the constant packet interarrival time that is not smaller than TX frame duration.…”
Section: Phy Datarate Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last case is the most robust and therefore the PHY datarate is near 1 Mbit/s. However the last case may be the realistic for the smart grid, where short packets are used [7] [8]. The calculated PHY datarates are correct for the constant packet interarrival time that is not smaller than TX frame duration.…”
Section: Phy Datarate Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frame contains a number of windows with constant size (guard intervals, priorities, etc. [5]) and a contention window with variable size that is measured in slots. The performance of the complete MAC layer depends basically on the algorithm, according to which the contention window is changed.…”
Section: Mac Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1 Contention window adaptation [5] In the figure the curves show the actual size of the contention window and the straight line the optimal values.…”
Section: Mac Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to [3], some tangible deliverables from smart grid initiatives include real-time pricing, demand response (DR), electric vehicle charging control, integration of distributed Furthermore, many smart grid applications require low data rate; hence, it is understandable that NPLC dominated previous discussions [9][10][11][12][13][14], and funded projects such as [15][16][17][18][19] in relation to smart grids and their applications in low voltage (LV) regions. Apart from electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) issues in PLC generally [20,21], other major arguments against BPLC have been that 2-30 MHz cannot traverse an medium voltage/low voltage (MV/LV) step-down transformer without external bypass coupling circuit and that it suffers from high attenuation with distance [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%