Performance Evaluation of Lower Limb Exoskeletons: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Benchmarks have long been used to verify and compare the readiness level of different technologies in many application domains. In the field of wearable robots, the lack of a recognized benchmarking methodology is one important impediment that may hamper the efficient translation of research prototypes into actual products. At the same time, an exponentially growing number of research studies are addressing the problem of quantifying the performance of robotic exoskeletons, resulting in a rich and highly heterogeneous picture of methods, variables and protocols. This review aims to organize this information, and identify the most promising performance indicators that can be converted into practical benchmarks. We focus our analysis on lower limb functions, including a wide spectrum of motor skills and performance indicators. We found that, in general, the evaluation of lower limb exoskeletons is still largely focused on straight walking, with poor coverage of most of the basic motor skills that make up the activities of daily life. Our analysis also reveals a clear bias towards generic kinematics and kinetic indicators, in spite of the metrics of human-robot interaction. Based on these results, we identify and discuss a number of promising research directions that may help the community to attain a com-

Exoskeleton use in post-stroke gait rehabilitation: a qualitative study of the perspectives of persons post-stroke and physiotherapists

“…Knowledge translation in neurological rehabilitation is complex with considerable challenges with respect to developing, sustaining and implementing multiprofessional perspectives [37][38][39], as well as a surprising lack of inclusion of persons with disabilities in the knowledge translation process. Additionally, there are inherent challenges in finding suitable professional and industry partners, as well as challenges in developing, funding and publishing mixed method research studies that explore not only the quantitative effects of a device, such as reported in a recent review on quantitative performance evaluation of these technologies [40], but also explore the perspectives of end-users. Thus, the development of strategic engineering -end user partnerships is essential to optimize the uptake of exoskeleton technology.…”

Benchmarking Wearable Robots: Challenges and Recommendations From Functional, User Experience, and Methodological Perspectives

“…best solution according to their unique abilities, desires, expectations, and needs. Fortunately, the scientific community has already addressed some of these issues in the past two decades: hundreds of studies have explored the biomechanical, physiological, and psychological implications of the interaction between humans and wearable robots (WRs) (Beckerle et al, 2017b(Beckerle et al, , 2019Pinto-Fernandez and Torricelli, 2020). This has been a multidisciplinary endeavor, which has resulted not only in scientific evidence and better robotic prototypes, but also in a plethora of potentially useful evaluation methods and protocols (Ghillebert et al, 2019;Ármannsdóttir et al, 2020;Davis et al, 2020).…”

A functional assembly framework based on implementable neurobionic material

“…Controlled by electroencephalogram or electromyogram signal, the lower limb exoskeleton may be a better alternative than a wheelchair 22 . Instead of basic walking or standing, researchers have developed more complicated functions like running or going up or downstairs 23 . The fine movement can also be facilitated by hand exoskeleton that helps in patients or elderly people rehabilitation and activities of daily life 4 .…”