2010 IEEE 71st Vehicular Technology Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/vetecs.2010.5493691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Joint Network-Channel Coding under a Real Network Topology Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to [28], we can observe a UEP behavior in Figure 4. Furthermore, the decoder in (23) with side information about the source-to-relay links, i.e., it knows the error probability in (23), provides better performance. Finally, we notice that decoding errors at the relays can seriously degrade the BER.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to [28], we can observe a UEP behavior in Figure 4. Furthermore, the decoder in (23) with side information about the source-to-relay links, i.e., it knows the error probability in (23), provides better performance. Finally, we notice that decoding errors at the relays can seriously degrade the BER.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where er j is an error vector that accounts for the errors at relay R j . By assuming that the decoding errors at the relay are independent and identically distributed, we can write (conditioning on the channel is avoided for ease of notation): By using (22) and (23), the Viterbi algorithm can be performed on the equivalent trellis associated to G(D).…”
Section: Channel-aware Receiver Designmentioning
confidence: 99%