Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Engineering
DOI: 10.1109/icde.1994.283051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of grid based multi-attribute record declustering methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solution 5 of the initial population partitions the relation into two fragments: [1,5,8,9,10] and [2,3,4,6,7]. The costs (number of disk accesses) and access path selections for each transaction are summarized in Table 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Solution 5 of the initial population partitions the relation into two fragments: [1,5,8,9,10] and [2,3,4,6,7]. The costs (number of disk accesses) and access path selections for each transaction are summarized in Table 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the second iteration, the genetic algorithm suggested repartitioning fragment 1 into [1,5] and [2,7,8], and fragment 2 into [3,4,9] and [6,10]. As a result, the number of disk accesses was decreased to 59.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…al [7,18,11,351. We note that no methods can achieve strict optimality for all query-sets [7,18,351. For example, no method can be strictly optimal for all range queries if the number of disks is greater than 5 [18, 351.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%