2022
DOI: 10.1002/suco.202100835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag‐based geopolymer concrete: A comparative study

Abstract: Nowadays, geopolymers, which are more environmentally friendly than cement due to the high energy requirements and high carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions of cement production, emerge as alternative binders. In this study, the mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer concrete (GC) based on ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) (100GGBS), 50% fly ash (FA) and 50% GGBS (50FA50GGBS), and FA (100FA) with two different water/geopolymer solids ratios (W/GP) of 0.33 and 0.35 were investigated. Slump, co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences are the time of curing, the temperature of curing, and the difference in the activator used. Yilmazoglu et al, 57 the compressive strength of the mortars in which 100% blast furnace slag was used found a maximum of 58.34 MPa. Since the study was carried out at room temperature and the alkali/binder ratio was 0.33, it differs from the obtained values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences are the time of curing, the temperature of curing, and the difference in the activator used. Yilmazoglu et al, 57 the compressive strength of the mortars in which 100% blast furnace slag was used found a maximum of 58.34 MPa. Since the study was carried out at room temperature and the alkali/binder ratio was 0.33, it differs from the obtained values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all these categories, fly ash and GGBS outperform PC, being produced from waste products and reducing the need for virgin materials. Furthermore, their application in concrete has demonstrated improvements in material durability and chemical attack resistance, thereby decreasing maintenance and repair needs over time [36,46,47].…”
Section: Sustainable Building Practices: Why Fly Ash and Ggbs Outperf...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the content of amorphous material in FA is between 30% and 60%, while GGBS contains more than 85% amorphous content [ 47 , 48 , 49 ]. In the XRD pattern, FA exhibits many sharp peaks, whereas GGBS exhibits a broad peak between 15° and 35° (2θ), with only a few weak sharp peaks.…”
Section: Geopolymer Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%