2008
DOI: 10.6026/97320630003205
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of DNA MOTIF discovery programs

Abstract: Abstract:Methods for the identification of transcription factor binding sites have proved to be useful for deciphering genetic regulatory networks. The strengths and weaknesses for a number of available web tools are not fully understood. Here, we designed a comprehensive set of performance measures and benchmarked sequence-based motif discovery tools using large scale datasets (derived from Escherichia coli genome and RegulonDB database). The benchmark study showed that nucleotide based and binding site based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The article “Performance evaluation of DNA motif discovery programs”, by Singh et al . Bioinformation 2008 3(5): 205-212 [ 1 ], has text that was taken directly from the article “Limitations and potentials of current motif discovery algorithms” by Hu et al . Nucleic Acids Res.…”
Section: Reader Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article “Performance evaluation of DNA motif discovery programs”, by Singh et al . Bioinformation 2008 3(5): 205-212 [ 1 ], has text that was taken directly from the article “Limitations and potentials of current motif discovery algorithms” by Hu et al . Nucleic Acids Res.…”
Section: Reader Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because so many different tools are available for DNA motif discovery, balanced comparisons are of major importance. Although some efforts in this have been attempted (134,276,293), it remains a major challenge to the work field to find objective standards for algorithm evaluation. The main reason for this is that the various tools score differently depending on the data sets, and absolute benchmarks are lacking (256,293) (134).…”
Section: In Silico Prediction Of Tfbssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article 1 retracted 2 by the journal (Bioinformation) was communicated by the first author (Chandra Prakash Singh) without our knowledge, willingness and consent. Hence, we the following report our innocence in this context.…”
Section: Note To Retarction Noticementioning
confidence: 99%