2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Different Types of Steel for Duck Foot Sweep Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional heat treatment (CHT) is simple, flexible, and economical, and is largely used for manipulating the microstructure, leading to alterations in the mechanical properties of the material used for earth engaging implements [26,27]. Suitable selection of the heat treatment temperature and subsequent cooling rate helps in attaining the desirable properties as per the requirements of application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional heat treatment (CHT) is simple, flexible, and economical, and is largely used for manipulating the microstructure, leading to alterations in the mechanical properties of the material used for earth engaging implements [26,27]. Suitable selection of the heat treatment temperature and subsequent cooling rate helps in attaining the desirable properties as per the requirements of application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Manuwa, (Manuwa, 2009), the reason being that at higher depths more soil volume is considered, soil becomes stiffer and denser (due to overburden pressure) and so strength properties vary. The reason for maximum value of draft for Sweep-2 was due to larger area of contact, larger cutting edge of the tool and due to soil abrasion Gupta et al, 2004).…”
Section: Effect Of Tool Shape Forward Speed and Depth Of Operation Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 550°C, with respect to the increase in toughness of the matrix, wear properties have deteriorated, which is due to a significant reduction in hardness [19]. Gupta et al [20] found that by increasing toughness up to a certain level, the wear resistance caused by abrasive particles increases, but further increase in toughness reduces the wear resistance, and after that, wear resistance depends on the hardness. In the study on wear resistant low-alloy chrome-molybdenum steel Fe-0.6C-1.5Cr-0.4Mo conducted by Hangung et al [21], it was found that wear resistance is related to hardness and toughness, and wear resistance has increased at 350°C where hardness and toughness are optimal.…”
Section: The Wear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%