2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of different pressure-velocity decoupling schemes in built environment simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the fact that the operating fluid is in the water channel and considering the low Reynolds numbers for the inlet fluid in the channel, Navier-Stokes relations for the fluid flow are considered as incompressible fluid with viscous dynamicsand a steady state condition. PISO procedure for pressure-velocity calculation in the Navier-Stokes equations has been adapted to this steady-state problem [27,28]. Hence the Navier-Stokes relations used in this case are as follows:…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that the operating fluid is in the water channel and considering the low Reynolds numbers for the inlet fluid in the channel, Navier-Stokes relations for the fluid flow are considered as incompressible fluid with viscous dynamicsand a steady state condition. PISO procedure for pressure-velocity calculation in the Navier-Stokes equations has been adapted to this steady-state problem [27,28]. Hence the Navier-Stokes relations used in this case are as follows:…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With some sacrifice of accuracy, the FFD was found that to be 50 times faster than conventional CFD algorithm [7]. Comparing different derivative schemes of FFD, some schemes can achieve similar accuracy as traditional CFD with half of the computation time [8]. Based on the high computing speed of FFD, many studies combine FFD with other algorithms [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%