Performance evaluation of deceptive and noise jamming on SAR focused image

Hanafy, Mohamed E.; Hassan, Hossam E. Abou-Bakr; Abdel-Latif, Mohamed S.; Elgamel, Sherif A.

doi:10.21608/iceeng.2018.30137

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Different jamming techniques, such as the noise jamming technique in [5], the smart noise jamming in [6], and the complete scene deception in [8] require JSR = 25; 20; 7 dB, respectively, to counter SAR. Meanwhile, the proposed deception jamming requires only JSR = 0 dB to achieve the same jamming effect on SAR.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is a significant saving in the jamming power used by the proposed deception technique than other jamming techniques in [5][6][7][8]. It is possible to implement the proposed jamming technique in practice rather than the other jamming techniques in [5][6][7][8] due to the saving in the jamming power. Fig.…”

Section: Jsr Comparison Of the Proposed Deceptive Jamming Technique W...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…10 shows the comparison of the required jamming power of different jamming techniques in [5][6][7][8] to counter SAR. Different jamming techniques, such as the noise jamming technique in [5], the smart noise jamming in [6], and the complete scene deception in [8] require JSR = 25; 20; 7 dB, respectively, to counter SAR. Meanwhile, the proposed deception jamming requires only JSR = 0 dB to achieve the same jamming effect on SAR.…”

Section: Jsr Comparison Of the Proposed Deceptive Jamming Technique W...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Through the proposed technique, a high intensity noise patches are formed to skin limited areas instead of scattering the jamming power over the whole SAR image. In [8], a comparative study of the performance of the deceptive and the noise jamming on a SAR focused image, with and without jamming, is performed. Structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and correlation coefficient (CC) are used as evaluation criteria to measure different jamming techniques' effect on a real SAR focused image (object of high interest).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Synthetic Aperture Radar Active Decoy

Elgamel

Abdel-Latif

2022

AiMT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been widely involved in military reconnaissance and detection of moving targets. SAR active decoy can generate deceptive jamming signal and it can severely affect the content of SAR focused image. SAR range Doppler algorithm (RDA) is considered as one of the most common algorithms utilized in the image formation processor (IFP) in SAR sensors. In this paper, the inverse RDA (IRDA) deception jamming technique and its evaluation criteria on SAR are demonstrated. Mathematical formulations for SAR RDA with and without deception jamming are presented. Matlab simulation and results of SAR RDA under the proposed deception scenario are discussed. SAR point target simulation of the proposed deceptive jamming and false target insertion into real large scene are also introduced. Comparison of the proposed deceptive jamming to signal power ratio (JSR) required to counter SAR with other SAR jamming techniques is analyzed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%