2009
DOI: 10.5081/jgps.8.2.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Combined L1/L5 Kalman Filter-Based Tracking versus Standalone L1/L5 Tracking in Challenging Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang, et al (2020) continued to use the joint tracking architecture, but replaced the conventional PLL by using the Kalman filter methodology both for the joint tracking and for the individual tracking. In contrast, Megahed, et al (2009) and Salem, et al (2012) proposed that using a Kalman filter to jointly track all carrier frequency different signals no longer have to track each signal individually. In order to lock on different carrier phases of different signals, they introduced an independent process noise for the carrier phase of each signal in the Kalman filter state equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang, et al (2020) continued to use the joint tracking architecture, but replaced the conventional PLL by using the Kalman filter methodology both for the joint tracking and for the individual tracking. In contrast, Megahed, et al (2009) and Salem, et al (2012) proposed that using a Kalman filter to jointly track all carrier frequency different signals no longer have to track each signal individually. In order to lock on different carrier phases of different signals, they introduced an independent process noise for the carrier phase of each signal in the Kalman filter state equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrier tracking include the usual PLL and FLL approaches (also encompassing different carrier phase loop discriminators and carrier lock detectors [Kap05]). Again, a class hierarchy consisting of a TrackingInterface class and subclasses implementing algorithms provides a way of testing different approaches, with full access to their parameters such as the Block Adjustment of Synchronizing Signal (BASS) method [Tsu00], strategies based on combinations of signals in different bands [Meg09], or ultra-tight hybridization schemes with IMUs [FP10b]. Fig.…”
Section: Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%