2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63396-7_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of ANOVA and RFE Algorithms for Classifying Microarray Dataset Using SVM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding n% percent of eigenvectors would then form the transformation matrix. ANOVA is also a common method for feature selection ( Sheikhan et al, 2013 ; Bejani and Gharavian, 2014 ; Li et al, 2018 ; Abdulsalam et al, 2020 ). It first performs the F test on each separate feature together with data labels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding n% percent of eigenvectors would then form the transformation matrix. ANOVA is also a common method for feature selection ( Sheikhan et al, 2013 ; Bejani and Gharavian, 2014 ; Li et al, 2018 ; Abdulsalam et al, 2020 ). It first performs the F test on each separate feature together with data labels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pot holder as shown in Figure 1 was constructed using a 5 mm rod mild steel to enable the pot (s) to maintain balance. With this holder, the cookware is established and the cooking pots were placed on the cookware which also form the focal point where uniform heat distribution is achieved [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Regardless of the dish tilt inclination angle, the pot is effortless placed on the pot-holder even as the device is been used to tracked the solar movement and elevation which contributes to asymmetry of the cooker.…”
Section: Pot Holdermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KNN identifies new locations based on the majority of noises from the sur-rounding k. According to the function of distance, the position given in the class is extremely mutually exclusive between the closest neighbors K. The following Eqs. ( 1)-(3) are the mathematical formulas for calculating the distance between two places [72].…”
Section: K-nearest Neighbor (Knn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations of these evaluation metrics are shown in Eqs. ( 4)-( 8) [72,74]. The true positives (TPs) signified news that was forecasted as fake and was FN, the true negatives (TNs) signified news that was fore-casted as not fake and was non-fake, the false positives (FPs) signified news that was forecasted as fake but was not fake, and the false negatives (FNs) signified news that was forecast as fake but was not fake [72,75].…”
Section: Evaluation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%