2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-011-0841-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of AL-FEC LDPC codes for push content applications in wireless unidirectional environments

Abstract: De Fez Lava, I.; Fraile Gil, F.; Belda Ortega, R.; Guerri Cebollada, JC. (2012). Performance evaluation of AL-FEC LDPC codes for push content applications in wireless unidirectional environments. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 60(3):669-688. doi:10.1007/s11042-011-0841-y. that depends on the packet loss rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…its download time. As explained in [7], there is an optimal code rate that minimizes the download time for clients of a file carousel. In this context, it is also important to bear in mind that different clients on a service area will experience different losses and consequently, the amount of AL-FEC parity needed should be optimized so as to minimize the average download time over all clients in a service area, instead of being optimized for the losses experienced by a client alone.…”
Section: A Al-fecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…its download time. As explained in [7], there is an optimal code rate that minimizes the download time for clients of a file carousel. In this context, it is also important to bear in mind that different clients on a service area will experience different losses and consequently, the amount of AL-FEC parity needed should be optimized so as to minimize the average download time over all clients in a service area, instead of being optimized for the losses experienced by a client alone.…”
Section: A Al-fecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the measurements apply a random transmission scheme (source and parity symbols are sent in a random order), which provides better results than a sequential scheme in the presence of burst losses [21]. In both analytical and experimental results, the measurements collect as many iterations as needed to provide a 99% confidence intervals.…”
Section: B Experimental Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value depends on each coding and different transmissions of the same file can provide different values so, in some codes it is not possible to obtain the inefficiency ratio analytically. We have chosen the value of 1.07 according to [15] and [21].…”
Section: B Evaluation Of Adaptive Ldpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, higher order statistical properties may be relevant or not depending on the application. For instance, the variance of the burst size is very important for real time streaming applications but, as reflected in [32] and [33] the Markov model provides accurate losses patterns to model file carousel transmissions over erasure channels.…”
Section: Ii21 Model For Packet Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, we have contributed with different proposals [32], [33] as well as with the undergoing thesis of the main author of the aforementioned research papers. Hereby, AL-FEC is regarded as a technology enabler that reduces in a drastic manner the number of carousel cycles needed to download a file.…”
Section: V3 Al-fecmentioning
confidence: 99%