Performance Evaluation of Adhoc Networks with Different Multicast Routing Protocols and Mobility Models

Malarkodi, B.; Gopal, P.; Venkataramani, B.

doi:10.1109/artcom.2009.29

Cited by 24 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Paper by Malarkodi et al [27] gives a more detailed classification in four categories: temporal dependency, spatial dependency, geographic restriction and hybrid characteristic. In this paper, it emphasises that the results of simulative performance evaluation strongly depends on the models used.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulation study on the impact of the transmission power on the performance of routing protocols under different Mobility Models

Macintosh

Feisiyau

Ghavami

2014

Fourth Edition of the International Conference on the Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH 2014)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-the dynamic topology of a mobile ad hoc network poses a real challenge in designing the routing protocol. This paper examine through simulation the fundamental factors, mobility models and transmission power which have a major impacts on the performance of position based routing protocols. We analyse the effect of the transmission power of on the performance of protocols under two different mobility models. Using OPNET simulation tool, results show the evaluation and performance of the proposed protocol under a unified simulation environment for different scenarios.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulation study on the impact of the transmission power on the performance of routing protocols under different Mobility Models

Macintosh

Feisiyau

Ghavami

2014

Fourth Edition of the International Conference on the Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH 2014)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…B. Malarkodi et al (2009) [2] the impact of different mobility models on Multicast Routing Protocols. The results showed that the throughput of ADMR is higher than of ODMRP at high mobility.…”

Section: Fig 2 Classification Of Manet Routing Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhanced Quality of Service Based Routing Protocol Using Hybrid Ant Colony Optimization and Particle Swarm Optimization

Kumari¹,

Sandhu²

2015

IJCATR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main problem of QoS routing is to setup a multicast hierarchy that may meet particular QoS constraint. In order to reduce the constraints of the earlier work a new improved technique is proposed in this work. In the proposed technique the issue of multi-cast tree is eliminated using clustering based technique. First of all multi-radio and multichannel based clustering is deployed and these cluster head are responsible for the multicasting. It will diminish the overall energy consumption of nodes and complexity of intelligent algorithms. The path will be evaluated based upon the ant colony optimization. Thus it has produced better results than other techniques.Keywords: QoS, Multicast, Ant colony optimisation, clustering. 1.IntroductionA Mobile Ad-hoc Network is an accumulation of independent mobile nodes that can communicate together via Radio Lake. Your mobile nodes which has been in radio selection of each various other could right communicate, whereas others needs the aid of intermediate nodes to route his or her packets. The entire node carries a radio user interface to connect jointly. These networks usually are fully distributed, and perform at any place without the aid of any fixed infrastructure as gain access to points or base areas. Figure 1 shows a simple ad-hoc network having 3 nodes. Node 1 in addition to node 3 isn't within range of each and every other, however the node 2 enables you to forward packets between node 1and node a couple of. The node 2 will behave as a router in addition to these three nodes in concert form an ad-hoc system.. Fig. 1 Example of mobile ad-hoc network 1.1 MANETs characteristics 1) Dispersed operation: There isn't background network for that central control in the network operations; the control in the network is distributed one of the nodes. The nodes associated with a MANET should cooperate with each other and communicate among themselves and each and every node acts to be a relay as essential, to implement specific functions for example routing and security.2) Multi get routing: When a node endeavours to send facts to other nodes that is out of its communication range, the packet the packet need to be forwarded via one or more intermediate node.3) Autonomous fatal: In MANET, each mobile node is an independent node, which will function as both a host and a router. 4) Vibrant topology:Nodes are unengaged to move arbitrarily using different speeds; so, the network topology might change randomly and also at unpredictable time. The nodes in the MANET dynamically determine routing among themselves since they travel around, establishing their unique network. 5) Light-weight terminals:Within maximum cases, the actual nodes at MANET are generally mobile with much less CPU capability, minimal power storage and also small memory measurement. 6) Shared Physical Medium:The wireless communication medium is obtainable to any entity with all the appropriate equipment and also adequate resources. Keeping that in mind, access to the channel is not restricted. Advantages of M...

show abstract

“…However Ad-Hoc networks show great potential in situations where internet access is not a key requirement or infrastructure is not available; including disaster or military scenarios or in low power wireless sensor networks or vehicles which only need to communicate with each other [9]. This paper is structured as follows; Section II discusses the core requirements of a MANET routing protocol, Section III discusses MANET routing principles, Section IV investigates some of the earliest MANET routing protocols; DSR and DSDV as well as the impact of mobility models on simulations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc NETworks (MANET)

Hinds¹,

Ngulube²,

Zhu³

et al. 2013

IJIET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The increase in availability and popularity of mobile wireless devices has lead researchers to develop a wide variety of Mobile Ad-hoc NETworking (MANET) protocols to exploit the unique communication opportunities presented by these devices. Devices are able to communicate directly using the wireless spectrum in a peer-to-peer fashion, and route messages through intermediate nodes, however the nature of wireless shared communication and mobile devices result in many routing and security challenges which must be addressed before deploying a MANET. In this paper we investigate the range of MANET routing protocols available and discuss the functionalities of several ranging from early protocols such as DSDV to more advanced such as MAODV, our protocol study focuses upon works by Perkins in developing and improving MANET routing. A range of literature relating to the field of MANET routing was identified and reviewed, we also reviewed literature on the topic of securing AODV based MANETs as this may be the most popular MANET protocol. The literature review identified a number of trends within research papers such as exclusive use of the random waypoint mobility model, excluding key metrics from simulation results and not comparing protocol performance against available alternatives.Index Terms-AODV, MANET, routing protocols. I. INTRODUCTIONWireless technologies such as Bluetooth or the 802.11 standards enable mobile devices to establish a Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) by connecting dynamically through the wireless medium without any centralised structure [1]. MANETs offer several advantages over traditional networks including reduced infrastructure costs, ease of establishment and fault tolerance, as routing is performed individually by nodes using other intermediate network nodes to forward packets [2], this multi-hopping reduces the chance of bottlenecks, however the key MANET attraction is greater mobility compared with wired solutions.There are a number of issues which affect the reliability of Ad-hoc networks and limit their viability for different scenarios; lack of centralised structure within MANET requires that each individual node must act as a router and is responsible for performing packet routing tasks; this is done using one or more common routing protocols across the MANET [3]. Performing routing tasks requires memory and computation power, however mobile devices feature physical size and weight limitations essential for their mobility, this Manuscript received September 6, 2012; revised December 12, 2012. This work was supported by the University of DerbyThe authors are with the University of Derby, Derbyshire, DE22 1GB, UK (e-mail: A.Hinds1@unimail.derby.ac.uk, eppiemike@aol.com, s.y.zhu@derby.ac.uk, h.al-aqrabi@derby.ac.uk ).reduces the available memory and computational resources as well as limiting battery power.MANETs containing more nodes require greater processing power, memory and bandwidth to maintain accurate routing information; this introduces traffic overhead into the network a...

show abstract

Performance Evaluation of Adhoc Networks with Different Multicast Routing Protocols and Mobility Models

Cited by 24 publications

References 11 publications

Simulation study on the impact of the transmission power on the performance of routing protocols under different Mobility Models

Simulation study on the impact of the transmission power on the performance of routing protocols under different Mobility Models

Enhanced Quality of Service Based Routing Protocol Using Hybrid Ant Colony Optimization and Particle Swarm Optimization

A Review of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc NETworks (MANET)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About