2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of a PCR panel (FilmArray® Pneumonia Plus) for detection of respiratory bacterial pathogens in respiratory specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anne-Clotilde Moy,
Antoine Kimmoun,
Thomas Merkling
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A very recent review article by Moy et al performed a meta-analysis on the diagnostic performances of FA-PNEU for the detection of respiratory bacterial pathogens in 8968 respiratory specimens. They concluded that 9.3% of bacteria detected in a culture were not included in the panel [21]. Similarly, these tests detect broad-spectrum resistance genes that clearly do not cover all currently encountered beta-lactamases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very recent review article by Moy et al performed a meta-analysis on the diagnostic performances of FA-PNEU for the detection of respiratory bacterial pathogens in 8968 respiratory specimens. They concluded that 9.3% of bacteria detected in a culture were not included in the panel [21]. Similarly, these tests detect broad-spectrum resistance genes that clearly do not cover all currently encountered beta-lactamases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For viruses, the PPA has also done well (96.7%) as compared to monoplex PCR [11]. A recent meta-analysis including 30 observational studies and 8969 samples also revealed high diagnostic performance for the FilmArray Pneumonia+ Panel as compared to a standard culture [12]. The authors pointed out the lower diagnostic performance of mPCR for sputum, due to frequent contamination by oropharyngeal flora, leading to numerous false positive results.…”
Section: Viral and Bacterial Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend extends to pneumonia, where molecular platforms now offer sample-to-answer highly multiplexed PCR (mPCR) for comprehensive viral and bacterial etiologies, as well as antimicrobial resistance (AMR) markers and semi-quantitative assessments. The developing role of molecular testing in pneumonia diagnostics has been highlighted in recent literature establishing increased sensitivity and faster time to results compared to culture-based methods [3]. Despite the technical superiority of molecular testing, debates continue regarding the role of molecular testing in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%