1996
DOI: 10.2307/2584345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation Models for Single-Item Periodic Pull Production Systems

Abstract: A number of pull production systems reported in the literature are found to be equivalent to a tandemqueue so that existing accurate tandem-queue approximation methods can be used to evaluate such systems. In this study, we consider developing an exact performance evaluation model for a non-tandemqueue equivalent pull production system using discrete-time Markov processes. It is a periodically controlled serial production system in which a single-item is processed at each stage with an exponential processing t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers analyzed production systems with such a control strategy by queueing networks. Several decomposition approaches were proposed for evaluating performance measures (Kirkavak and Dincer [16], Frein and Di Mascolo [12], Di Mascolo [9], Di Mascolo et al [10], Mitra and Mitrani [17,18]). Deleersnyder et al [7] modeled a production system with the control strategy by a discrete time Markov process and proposed an iterative method for performance measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers analyzed production systems with such a control strategy by queueing networks. Several decomposition approaches were proposed for evaluating performance measures (Kirkavak and Dincer [16], Frein and Di Mascolo [12], Di Mascolo [9], Di Mascolo et al [10], Mitra and Mitrani [17,18]). Deleersnyder et al [7] modeled a production system with the control strategy by a discrete time Markov process and proposed an iterative method for performance measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%