2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation for three pollution detection methods using data from a real contamination accident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their algorithm significantly improves detection performance under multi-index evidence conflicts. Liu et al [6] compared the detection performance of three contamination detection methods, namely, a Pearson correlation Euclidean distance (PE)-based detection method, a multivariate Euclidean distance method, and a linear prediction filter method, using data from an actual contamination accident. The PE method can differentiate between equipment noise and contamination presence better than the two other methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their algorithm significantly improves detection performance under multi-index evidence conflicts. Liu et al [6] compared the detection performance of three contamination detection methods, namely, a Pearson correlation Euclidean distance (PE)-based detection method, a multivariate Euclidean distance method, and a linear prediction filter method, using data from an actual contamination accident. The PE method can differentiate between equipment noise and contamination presence better than the two other methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the reviewed studies in the present work concluded that the methods proposed by authors are capable of detecting certain contamination events [2], [5]- [7], [12], [14]- [18], [20]. However, further research is needed to test these methods for conditions, which could influence the accuracy of the methods.…”
Section: Contamination Detectionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Numerous studies have been done to develop and select the most precise event detection algorithm. The accuracy of the event detection method is defined by its ability to place the current measurement of water quality parameters into one of two classes: background -clear and safe water, event -contaminated water [12]. The detection methods during last decades have evolved and expanded from single factor correlation analysis to generic algorithms and artificial neural network analysis.…”
Section: Contamination Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations