2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-opt.2018.5076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation and comparison of spatial modulation and non‐DC MIMOm‐CAP techniques in indoor VLC system

Abstract: In this paper, we propose and apply two novel schemes of multi-band carrierless amplitude and phase (m-CAP) modulation for spatial modulation (SM) based visible light communications (VLC) systems. In SM, both spatial and signal constellation are utilised to improve the performance of the m-CAP system. Here, we have adopted the non-DC m-CAP which is a power efficient technique with no DC-bias. The bit error rate (BER) performance and the spectral efficiency of the proposed systems are compared with single-input… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, carrier-less amplitude and phase (CAP) modulation, as a surrogate to OFDM, has been proposed for VLC, where the carrier frequencies are produced by simple and cost-efficient finite impulse response (FIR) filters. In CAP (i) there is not any fast Fourier transform (FFT) and inverse FFT (IFFT) as in OFDM, which reduces the complexity of the VLC system; and (ii) is more robust against the LED nonlinearity given that PAPR values are lower compared with OFDM [21]. Nevertheless, a flat frequency response, which is required for optimal CAP performance, represents a substantial challenge towards implementing CAP in VLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, carrier-less amplitude and phase (CAP) modulation, as a surrogate to OFDM, has been proposed for VLC, where the carrier frequencies are produced by simple and cost-efficient finite impulse response (FIR) filters. In CAP (i) there is not any fast Fourier transform (FFT) and inverse FFT (IFFT) as in OFDM, which reduces the complexity of the VLC system; and (ii) is more robust against the LED nonlinearity given that PAPR values are lower compared with OFDM [21]. Nevertheless, a flat frequency response, which is required for optimal CAP performance, represents a substantial challenge towards implementing CAP in VLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%