2019 First International Conference of Intelligent Computing and Engineering (ICOICE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icoice48418.2019.9035141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Enhancement For Gender Recognition Using Trainable Bank of Gabor Filters and NCA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basulaim and Dabash [4] used a bank of Gabor filters with auto configured using parts of facial images, FERET_DATASET is used which contains 474 training and 472 testing face images. A bank of Gabor filters is created and configured for each sub-face which is called COSFIRE (Combination of Shifted Filter Responses) and choose multi-interest prototypes automatically.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basulaim and Dabash [4] used a bank of Gabor filters with auto configured using parts of facial images, FERET_DATASET is used which contains 474 training and 472 testing face images. A bank of Gabor filters is created and configured for each sub-face which is called COSFIRE (Combination of Shifted Filter Responses) and choose multi-interest prototypes automatically.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LFW+ Antipov et al (2017) 0.993 Antipov et al (2016) 0.971 Jia and Cristianini (2015) 0.968 GF Simanjuntak and Azzopardi (2019) 0.974 Basulaim and Dabash (2019) 0.958 Azzopardi et al (2018b) 0.947 Adience Gurnani et al (2019) 0.918 Dehghan et al (2017) 0.910 Afifi and Abdelhamed (2019) 0.906 MG Azzopardi et al (2018b) 0.915 Carletti et al (2020a) 0.902 Azzopardi et al (2017) 0.802 small architectures on LFW, LFWA, LFW+, GENDER-FERET and GENDER-COLOR-FERET (Del Coco et al 2016); on the other hand, it emerges the evidence that on different test sets the performance can drop below 0.90, especially with cross-dataset evaluations, as happens for Adience and MIVIA-Gender. Only in a few cases the analysis is carried out on more than one benchmark (Azzopardi et al 2018b) (Foggia et al 2019) (Afifi and Abdelhamed 2019) to evaluate the generalization capabilities of the methods and, in most of the papers, the experimentation is performed on images not representing the real conditions.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM classifiers trained with COSFIRE filters (Azzopardi et al 2016b) or with a fusion of these features and local SURF descriptors (Azzopardi et al 2018b) obtain 0.936 and 0.947 of accuracy, respectively. Basulaim and Dabash (2019) further improve the performance to 0.958 by using COS-FIRE filters and a cubic SVM. Simanjuntak and Azzopardi (2019) retain the current state of the art performance on this dataset (0.974) with a fusion of CNN and COSFIRE-based features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%