Performance Differences in Elite National Basketball Association and Women’s National Basketball Association Players Based Upon Whether the Dominant or Non-dominant Achilles Tendon Was Ruptured

Abstract

Background National Basketball Association (NBA) and Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) players with Achilles tendon ruptures have previously been noted to have a significant decline in performance post-injury. There has been recent anecdotal evidence that elite players with dominant Achilles tendon ruptures may be able to return at a higher level of play post-rupture. Objective This study aimed to evaluate for any differences in performance in higher-performing NBA and WNBA players with dominant versus non-dominant Achilles tendon ruptures pre- and post-injury. Methods This study was conducted at the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. NBA and WNBA players with an Achilles tendon rupture from 1990 to 2020 were identified. Only elite players, indicated by an average player efficiency rating (PER) of >15 in either of the three seasons pre/post-injury, were included. The average PER, offensive rating, defensive rating, and usage percentage were compared in the three seasons pre- and post-injury. Results Eighteen players met the inclusion criteria, and nine each were classified as dominant and non-dominant Achilles tendon ruptures based on their primary shooting hand. There was no significant difference between the dominant and non-dominant rupture groups in any outcomes pre-injury, including age. The non-dominant cohort had a significant decline in PER (20.04 vs. 14.16; p < 0.001) and offensive rating (110.33 vs. 101.56; p = 0.004) post-injury. There was no significant difference observed post-injury in defensive rating or usage percentage. The dominant cohort had no significant difference in any outcomes post-injury, returning to the same level of play as pre-injury. Despite no difference existing between the groups at baseline, the dominant group performed significantly better post-rupture with regard to PER (19.56 vs. 14.16; p < 0.001) and offensive rating (114.00 vs. 101.56; p < 0.001) versus the non-dominant group. Conclusion Elite NBA and WNBA players with dominant Achilles tendon ruptures had no change in performance post-injury, returning to the same level of production as pre-injury. Post-rupture, they demonstrated notably superior outcomes versus the non-dominant group with regard to PER and offensive rating. The non-dominant rupture group experienced the same decline in PER and offensive rating post-injury observed in previous studies. The data indicate that elite NBA and WNBA players with a dominant Achilles tendon rupture have a much more favorable recovery post-injury and are able to return to the same level of performance.