2002
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2002.251.254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance, Correlation and Heritability Studies on Selected Sweet Corn Synthetic Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomass yield and yield components were inversely correlated with days to tasseling (r = -0.33 to -0.50 for Cross 1, r = -0.23 to -0.43 for Cross 2) and days to silking (r = -0.38 to -0.63 for Cross 1, r = -0.24 to -0.53 for Cross 2) in both populations, which implied that earlier maturing individuals had lower biomass yield. Similar results were reported by Kashiani et al (2014) and Saleh et al (2002). The results on the genetic correlations amongst biomass yield its components were consistent with those of the phenotypic correlations such that the correlation coefficients were high and significant (at p<0.01), suggesting that all biomass yield traits (fresh and dry plant yield) and their components were genetically correlated.…”
Section: Quality Traitssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Biomass yield and yield components were inversely correlated with days to tasseling (r = -0.33 to -0.50 for Cross 1, r = -0.23 to -0.43 for Cross 2) and days to silking (r = -0.38 to -0.63 for Cross 1, r = -0.24 to -0.53 for Cross 2) in both populations, which implied that earlier maturing individuals had lower biomass yield. Similar results were reported by Kashiani et al (2014) and Saleh et al (2002). The results on the genetic correlations amongst biomass yield its components were consistent with those of the phenotypic correlations such that the correlation coefficients were high and significant (at p<0.01), suggesting that all biomass yield traits (fresh and dry plant yield) and their components were genetically correlated.…”
Section: Quality Traitssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Both heritability and genetic advance estimates could give a suggestion on the genetic control of traits (Anshuman et al 2013;Bekele & Rao 2014;Kumar et al 2014). For instance, traits like days to tasseling and silking have high heritability and low GCV and PCV, suggesting that the observed variation in these traits were attributed to a small number of genes with dominance effects (Saleh et al 2002). This was in accordance with the findings of and Saleh et al (2002) in their studies of heritability for yield traits in sweet corn and Ravindra and Karan (2018) for grain corn.…”
Section: Expected Gain From Selection For Biomass and Quality Traits In Forage Maizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, Jagung Manis Sandakan (C5) showed the longest (16.24 cm), and Jagung Kampung Telupid (C2) recorded the shortest (7 cm) cob length (Figure 6). A significant difference in cob length among different corn varieties was mentioned by previous studies, which ranges between 11.9 to 17 cm [28], an average of 12.5 cm [29] and 13.09 to 14.27 cm [30]. Variety significantly influences plant height, cob length, and cob weight [16].…”
Section: Corn Yield Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported that the effect of selection can depend also on the performance level of the initial population. As our initial population was selected for several years by mass selection, the additive variance for traits with high heritability might have been exploited already well and further improvement would be only possible by selection under environments with greater diversity.4.2 | Effect on earliness of full-sib selectionMaize-flowering time is a highly heritable trait(Hemavathy, 2020;Ojo et al, 2020;Saboor Khan et al, 2018;G. Saleh et al, 1993; G. B. Saleh F I G U R E 2 2 The number of kernel rows in S2-selection before and after selection with colours and shading representing the four locations in the evaluation year.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%