Performance comparisons of synthetic and mineral oil crankcase lubricant base stocks

Abstract

The physical and performance characteristics of representative synthetic base stocks are compared with those of mineral oils. Comparisons of the base stocks alone and as fully formulated crankcase lubricants are presented.Bench test results and physical properties of unformulated synthetic and mineral oil base stocks are compared. The volatility characteristics of synthetic base stocks are superior to typical mineral oil base stocks. All the synthetic base stocks displayed greater viscosity indices than did mineral oils. Bench tests designed to measure thermal and oxidative stabilities are used to compare synthetic with mineral oil base stocks. Although synthetics appeared no more resistant to oxidation than did mineral oils, fewer sediments, deposits andfluid viscosity increases were observed with synthetic base stocks. No one type of synthetic base oil showed a distinct advantage in these evaluations.Fully formulated mineral oil-based lubricants are compared with commonly used synthetic-based lubricants containing identical additive treatments. The synthetic lubricants showed superior engine cleanliness, and resistance to viscosity increased in these tests, but were directionally less effective in wear prevention than mineral oil-based lubricants. Proper formulation or addition of an antiwear supplement overcame this deficiency.These comparisons demonstrated that synthetic base stocks are available with a wide range of physical properties. Available synthetic base stocks offer performance advantages at an increased cost over mineral oils, but proper formulation of the synthetic lubricant is necessary to ensure totally acceptable lubricant performance. in engine tests used to qualify crankcase lubricants for API CD/SF classification. This testing resulted in the successful formulation of S A E 5W-30 and SAEOW-20 (Arctic fluid) synthetic lubricants for use in both heavy duty diesel and lead free gasoline cngine applications. Diesel fleet test data are also presented which compare the performances of a SAE 5W-30 synthetic formulation with single and multigrade mineral oil blends. Ripple and Fuhrmann PROPERTIES OF SYNTHETIC BASE STOCKSA synthetic base stock is a product prepared by chemically reacting lower molecular weight materials to produce a fluid of higher molccular weight with planned and predictable properties. Synthetic base oils may range from being quite similar to conventional mineral oils in chemical structure, to being JSL 6-3 Crankcase lubricants 211 1040 134 Pour point ('C) -15 -57 -57

Chemically Modifying Vegetable Oils to Prepare Green Lubricants

“…• They are more expensive than mineral lubricants [4]; • They are relatively more toxic than vegetable oil-based lubricants; • They are less readily biodegradable than vegetable oil-based lubricants; • They have a lower friction tolerance and their exhausts pose problems in the environment; • They do not work well with mineral oils.…”

Gas-Expanded Lubricants for Increased Energy Efficiency and Control in Rotating Machinery

“…Because mineral oils also tend to increase in viscosity as they degrade over time, whereas some synthetic oils do not, synthetics have been shown to generally outperform mineral oils in many performance metrics including energy efficiency [4,[10][11][12]. Other lubricant properties including thermal conductivity and heat capacity have also been found to have an impact on bearing performance, though their effects are smaller when compared to viscosity and viscosity index [10].…”