Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2166966.2166972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparisons of phrase sets and presentation styles for text entry evaluations

Abstract: We empirically compare five different publicly-available phrase sets in two large-scale (N = 225 and N = 150) crowdsourced text entry experiments. We also investigate the impact of asking participants to memorize phrases before writing them versus allowing participants to see the phrase during text entry. We find that asking participants to memorize phrases increases entry rates at the cost of slightly increased error rates. This holds for both a familiar and for an unfamiliar text entry method. We find statis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This set consists of sentences from genuine mobile emails that have been validated to be memorable. It has also been shown [4] that this set of sentences results in comparable performances to the earlier and less externally valid phrase set by MacKenzie and Soukoreff [7].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This set consists of sentences from genuine mobile emails that have been validated to be memorable. It has also been shown [4] that this set of sentences results in comparable performances to the earlier and less externally valid phrase set by MacKenzie and Soukoreff [7].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Before each phrase participants were asked to put their hands by their side, in order to mimic aperiodic interaction with the peripheral from VR. Based on [11], we used the MacKenzie 500 phrase set, with phrases chosen at random and presented at the top of the display, with the bottom of the display used for on-screen feedback of typing. Baseline typing was captured first, the remaining conditions were counterbalanced.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used phrases from the Enron Mobile Email dataset [36] as stimuli. This phrase set consists of phrases drawn from genuine mobile emails and has been shown to result in similar text entry performance as the MacKenzie and Soukoreff [22] phrase set [18]. We filtered out any phrases containing characters not on our keyboard, and then removed sentences with fewer than 4 or more than 10 words.…”
Section: Study 1: Gp and Correction Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%