Performance Comparison of Various controllers on Semi-Active Vehicle Suspension System

Abstract

The value of a self-tuning adaptive semi-active control scheme for automotive suspension systems is discussed in this paper. The current vehicle suspension system uses fixed-coeffcient springs and dampers. The ability of vehicle suspension systems to provide good road handling and improve passenger comfort is usually valued. Passive suspension allows you to choose between these two options. Semi-Active suspension(SAS), on the other hand, can provide both road handling and comfort by manipulating the suspension force actuators directly. The semi-active suspension system for a quarter car model is compared to passive and various controllers such as Proportional-Integral, Proportional-Integral-Derivative, Internal model control (IMC)-PID, IMC-PID with filter, FUZZY, and Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system(ANFIS) in this analysis. This research could be relevant in the future for designing better car suspension adjustments to eliminate vertical jerks and rolling motion experienced by the vehicle body on bumps and humps.

Enhancing the Performance of Active Suspension Systems Through Adaptive Control

“…Typically, a controller included in a semi-active suspension system adjusts the shock absorber damping capacity to ensure safe and enjoyable riding. Semi-active systems lack the power of active systems, even if they are more flexible than passive ones [6,7].…”