2014
DOI: 10.14445/22312803/ijctt-v12p111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison of Two Streaming Data Clustering Algorithms

Abstract: Abstract-The weighted fuzzy c-mean clustering algorithm (WFCM) and weighted fuzzy c-mean-adaptive cluster number (WFCM-AC) are extension of traditional fuzzy c-mean algorithm to stream data clustering algorithm. Clusters in WFCM are generated by renewing the centers of weighted cluster by iteration. On the other hand, WFCM-AC generates clusters by applying WFCM on the data & selecting best K± initialize center. In this paper we have compared these two methods using KDD-CUP'99 data set. We have compared these a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It uses a decaying cluster structure with a histogram to approximate the streaming data. Although the algorithm has the disadvantage of needing an expert intervention to specify many parameters before it works, its performance is better than HPStream algorithm [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses a decaying cluster structure with a histogram to approximate the streaming data. Although the algorithm has the disadvantage of needing an expert intervention to specify many parameters before it works, its performance is better than HPStream algorithm [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%