2011
DOI: 10.5121/ijwmn.2011.3301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison of Minimum Hop and Minimum Edge Based Multicast Routing Under Different Mobility Models for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only treebased data gathering algorithm we have come across for WMSNs is a shortest path-based spanning tree algorithm [9] wherein each sensor node can have at most a certain number of child nodes. Based on our experiences from mobile ad hoc networks, minimum hop-based shortest paths and trees in mobile network topologies are quite unstable and need to be frequently reconfigured [10] [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only treebased data gathering algorithm we have come across for WMSNs is a shortest path-based spanning tree algorithm [9] wherein each sensor node can have at most a certain number of child nodes. Based on our experiences from mobile ad hoc networks, minimum hop-based shortest paths and trees in mobile network topologies are quite unstable and need to be frequently reconfigured [10] [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only tree-based data gathering algorithm we have come across for WMSNs is a shortest path-based spanning tree algorithm [9] wherein each sensor node is constrained to have at most a certain number of child nodes. Based on the results from the literature of mobile ad hoc networks (e.g., [10] [11]), minimum hop shortest paths and trees in mobile network topologies are quite unstable and need to be frequently reconfigured. We could not find any other related work on tree-based data gathering for WMSNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…target delay and delay probability. The trade-offs between two tree based routing strategies with respect to hop count and number of edges are described in [11,12]. In short, several trade-off analyses of various QoS metrics on different aspects have been carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%