2012
DOI: 10.21236/ada561957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison of High Resolution Weather Research and Forecasting Model Output with North American Mesoscale Model Initialization Grid Forecasts

Abstract: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including sugges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model results were comparable or better than efforts from previous ML frost forecast studies (Verdes et al, 2000;Diedrichs et al, 2018) (24-h F1 = 0.39-0.68), although a direct comparison between studies is difficult due to differences in methodology, input data, environmental settings of where the models were applied, and prediction lead-time. Our temperature predictions also achieved better performance metrics than available large-scale numerical weather models such as the HRRR model and compared to models assessed in previous studies (Raby et al, 2012). Such forecasts could provide accurate predictions of frost at the point scale in areas of complex topography where numerical models perform relatively poorly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model results were comparable or better than efforts from previous ML frost forecast studies (Verdes et al, 2000;Diedrichs et al, 2018) (24-h F1 = 0.39-0.68), although a direct comparison between studies is difficult due to differences in methodology, input data, environmental settings of where the models were applied, and prediction lead-time. Our temperature predictions also achieved better performance metrics than available large-scale numerical weather models such as the HRRR model and compared to models assessed in previous studies (Raby et al, 2012). Such forecasts could provide accurate predictions of frost at the point scale in areas of complex topography where numerical models perform relatively poorly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Due to the localized nature of temperature in Northern New Mexico and the course spatial resolution of alternative temperature predictions (1 km-WRF, 3 km-HRRR, 12 km-NAMeso), the ML model predictions are likely an improvement over existing data available to farmers. The WRF and NAMeso models were found by one study to have a regional average RMSE of 2.6–2.88°C for a 24-h lead time (Raby et al, 2012 ), which is slightly worse than the model results for the Alcalde station (RMSE= 2.19–2.37°C). Further, The ML models presented outperformed the HRRR model forecast by a large margin, resulting in an improved 6-h forecast RMSE of about 1.5°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%