Performance Comparison of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) with H.264 AVC

Ram, Chena

doi:10.1109/sitis.2017.58

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although developed by the same organization, in general H.265/HEVC is superior compared to its predecessor. This was consistent with [3] that stated H.265 has a bit-rate of nearly 50% lower compared to H.264 because of the adoption of several advanced encoding techniques. H.265/HEVC partitioned images into Coding Tree Blocks (CTBs).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Based on the study several years ago study until now, the assessment of audio and video quality is still an interesting issue and continues to evolve [3]. Based on this trend, the video encoding technique is the most often topic discussed in the research community and broadcasting experts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It can be used by who might be interested in the development of video coding. The next research conducted by [3] aims to compare the performance of HEVC with H.264/AVC based on objective assessment. According to the experiment results, the HEVC standard is more suitable for applications with low bitrates and has low-delay communication.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Objective Quality Assessment of Multi-Resolution Video based on H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC Encoding

Rizal¹,

Suharso²,

Abujabbar³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 20

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to carry out an objective assessment by evaluating the encoding performance of the new standard compared to its predecessor H.264/AVC. In addition, to produce a comprehensive investigation, we compared several resolutions (1080p, 720p, and 480p) with a combination of CRF and encoder presets. To find out the performance of both techniques we used several test parameters such as encoding duration, compression ratio, bitrate, MSE, and PSNR. The results showed that H.264 was faster in terms of the time needed to carry out the encoding process. However the compression ratio and bitrate of H.265 was better with a difference of 38.5% and 52.7% respectively. Finally, if the user wants to prioritize better quality video output without having to sacrifice a lot of compression time and small file size, then our recommendation is to use H.265 and by HD resolution configuration (720p) with medium presets and 18 CRF value.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Objective Quality Assessment of Multi-Resolution Video based on H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC Encoding

Rizal¹,

Suharso²,

Abujabbar³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 20

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Berdasarkan studi beberapa tahun lalu hingga studi saat ini, penilaian kualitas audio dan video masih menjadi permasalahan yang menarik dan terus berkembang (Ram & Panwar, 2017). Adanya tren tersebut, teknik encoding video menjadi topik yang paling sering dibahas dalam komunitas riset dan pakar penyiaran.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Video applications consume more energy on the Internet and can be accessed by electronic devices, due to an increase in the consumption of high-resolution and high-quality video content, presenting serious issues to delivery infrastructure that needs higher video compression technologies. The focus of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the most current codec, AV1, to its predecessor codec. The comparison was made experimentally at two video resolutions (1080p and 720p) by sampling video frames with various CRF/CQP values and testing several parameters analyses such as encoding duration, compression ratio, bit rate, Mean Square Error (MSE), and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR). The AV1 codec is very great in terms of quality and file size, even though it is slower in terms of compression speed. The H.265/HEVC codec, on the other side, beats the other codec in terms of compression ratio. In conclusion, the H.265/HEVC codec is suggested as a material for obtaining a well compressed video with small file size and a short time.

show abstract

“…Subsequent analysis of the model is based on the ten video traces. H.264/AVC standard is the most widely used video coding standard for streaming videos, mobile/handheld applications, HDTV broadcasting [9]. In order to achieve a higher compression ratio, H.264/AVC standard divided video frames into three categories: I-frames, B-frames and P-frames.…”

Section: A Service Compositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Traffic Model for Teleconsultation Based on the Service Characteristics

Yang¹,

Zhang²,

Kang³

2018

Proceedings of the 2018 3rd International Conference on Communications, Information Management and Network Security (CIMNS 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rapid development of numerous emerging network services poses a challenge to the network resources allocation with their bandwidth requirements and statistical characteristics. Network traffic modeling plays an important role in network resources allocation which can be used to guarantee Quality-of-Service (QoS) of these new services. In this study, we analyzed the service composition and traffic characteristics of the spreading teleconsultation service and establish a traffic model. The obtained experimental results show that the proposed methodology which combines discrete autoregressive model (DAR) and wavelet analysis provides good accuracy in teleconsultation service traffic modeling. Keywords-service traffic model; video traffic; discrete autoregressive model; wavelet model I. As Figure 1 shows, teleconsultation service provides video communication, medical images and teleconsultation text transmission between patient and doctor. Teleconsultation holds about ten to fifteen minutes. At the beginning of the teleconsultation process, medical images are transmitted and then there will be teleconsultation text transmission. Video transmission occurs throughout the process, so it is obvious that

show abstract

Performance Comparison of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) with H.264 AVC

Cited by 6 publications

References 33 publications

Objective Quality Assessment of Multi-Resolution Video based on H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC Encoding

Objective Quality Assessment of Multi-Resolution Video based on H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC Encoding

Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1

Traffic Model for Teleconsultation Based on the Service Characteristics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About