11th IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications. PIMRC 2000. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8525
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2000.881461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of frequency flopping and direct sequence spread spectrum systems in the 2.4 GHz range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DSSS radios are believed to operate better for large data packets in low to medium interference environments, while FHSS radios operate better for small data packets in high interference environments. Moreover, FHSS radios perform better indoors and in harsh multipath environments because frequency hopping techniques are able to manage multipath fading environments by hopping to new frequency channels [ 94 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSSS radios are believed to operate better for large data packets in low to medium interference environments, while FHSS radios operate better for small data packets in high interference environments. Moreover, FHSS radios perform better indoors and in harsh multipath environments because frequency hopping techniques are able to manage multipath fading environments by hopping to new frequency channels [ 94 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%