2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23116009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison of Five Methods for Tetrahymena Number Counting on the ImageJ Platform: Assessing the Built-in Tool and Machine-Learning-Based Extension

Abstract: Previous methods to measure protozoan numbers mostly rely on manual counting, which suffers from high variation and poor efficiency. Although advanced counting devices are available, the specialized and usually expensive machinery precludes their prevalent utilization in the regular laboratory routine. In this study, we established the ImageJ-based workflow to quantify ciliate numbers in a high-throughput manner. We conducted Tetrahymena number measurement using five different methods: particle analyzer method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Watershed method showed overcounting in most cases. Previously, Watershed has been proposed as a common method used for separation, especially in cell-related studies [36,52]. However, in this study, the birds were normally not circular-/oval-shaped; thus, this might have compromised the object separation of the Watershed method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the Watershed method showed overcounting in most cases. Previously, Watershed has been proposed as a common method used for separation, especially in cell-related studies [36,52]. However, in this study, the birds were normally not circular-/oval-shaped; thus, this might have compromised the object separation of the Watershed method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To test the recording setup and analyzing workflow, we firstly performed the locomotion analysis on the wild-type T. thermophila CU428 strain without any special treatment. All videos were captured by a high-resolution CCD mounted onto an upright microscope with a 4× objective lens [ 41 ]. Since a good video recording process is crucial to ensure optimal tracking performance, we found that videos with a resolution of 3840 × 2160 pixels and a frame rate of 30 frames per second could provide an optimal recording and achieve high contrast suitable for TRex tracking and analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The video was recorded for 10 s at 30 frames per second (fps) and saved in the .mp4 format. The recording setup was established based on a previous publication [ 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we utilized StarDist for Wolffia globosa frond counting. The idea of using StarDist came from our previous study to count Tetrahymena cells with a circular shape [ 35 ]. The result of Wolffia detection using StarDist showed promising results, as presented in Figure 2 , with several misdetections due to light reflections on some parts of the microplate and reflection of Wolffia .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been studies that used artificial intelligence/machine learning methods to overcome contaminated water through machine learning applications [ 33 ] and quantify cell growth for toxicity studies in other species/cell lines [ 34 , 35 ]. The use of a machine learning-based method might be a solution to the limitation of ImageJ limitation as free software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%