Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018 International Conference on Advanced Systems and Electric Technologies (IC_ASET) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/aset.2018.8379899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of backstepping and sliding mode controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of comparison simulation (Simulation 6) are given in Figure 9 and Figure 10. In the literature, it is mentioned that the backstepping has worse robustness to disturbances compared with sliding-mode control (Tiga et al, 2018). However, our simulation results showed that by adding disturbance estimation, the backstepping control can compete in performance with the sliding mode control and it has no problems such as chattering phenomena.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of comparison simulation (Simulation 6) are given in Figure 9 and Figure 10. In the literature, it is mentioned that the backstepping has worse robustness to disturbances compared with sliding-mode control (Tiga et al, 2018). However, our simulation results showed that by adding disturbance estimation, the backstepping control can compete in performance with the sliding mode control and it has no problems such as chattering phenomena.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eşitliği ile ifade edilebilir. Buna göre ters sarkaç sisteminin durum uzay modeli [19] 1 3 (10) eşitlikleri kolaylıkla çıkartılır.…”
Section: Ters Sarkaç Sistemi Ve Matematiksel Modeliunclassified
“…It proved its effectiveness in many frameworks, [21][22][23][24] and compared to other robust controllers, it showed its capability to stabilize the system and to track accurately the reference signal in reduced response time. 25,26 However, it can be sensitive to the system parameters variation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%