2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-3664(02)00092-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison between TCP Reno and TCP Vegas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of out-of order delivery, destination generates duplicate acknowledgements for fast retransmissions. Source avoids such unnecessary fast retransmission [8].…”
Section: International Journal Of Computer Applications (0975 -8887) mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of out-of order delivery, destination generates duplicate acknowledgements for fast retransmissions. Source avoids such unnecessary fast retransmission [8].…”
Section: International Journal Of Computer Applications (0975 -8887) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Destination resends the acknowledgement with the highest sequence number by following cumulative acknowledgement concept. The DSR -Dynamic Source Routing protocol is modified to implement ECIA based scheme [8].…”
Section: Ecia Based Tcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to [6], TCP Vegas can achieve upwards of 40% higher throughput than TCP Reno, and this is supported with related simulation and implementation experiments. However, recent research has shown that TCP Vegas suffers a serious disadvantage when in competition with TCP Reno, unless parameter adjustment is made [8]. This leads potential implementers to the inescapable conclusion that TCP Vegas cannot compete effectively on the public Internet and would produce poor performance results in that environment.…”
Section: Tcp Vegasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when Vegas competes with itself, the results have shown that the overall throughput values achieved in the system are lower indicating that maximising resource usage presents a problem for Vegas. Dynamic parameter adjustment, as suggested in [8], was not considered, since it is unlikely that such an implementation will be encountered on the public Internet at present.…”
Section: Throughputsmentioning
confidence: 99%