Performance Comparison and Evaluation of Different Multipath Routing Protocols Based on Various Scenario and Traffic Patterns for Mobile AD Hoc Networks

Periyasamy, P.; Karthikeyan, E.

doi:10.5815/ijcnis.2013.01.03

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The performance of LRMR and AOMDV routing protocols are evaluated under Random waypoint mobility model with varying number of connections using NS 2.34 [20,21,22,23,24,25] and the simulation parameters shown in Table IV From Fig. 2, Fig.…”

Section: A Environmental Setupmentioning

confidence: 99%

Link reliable multipath routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks

Periyasamy¹,

Karthikeyan²

2015

2015 International Conference on Circuits, Power and Computing Technologies [ICCPCT-2015]

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliable data transmission among mobile nodes in highly dynamic ad hoc networks was not ensured by AOMDV routing protocol due to the selection of the multiple node disjoint paths based on only minimal hop counts that lead to link failures and route breaks. For eliminating such problems, we propose an improved ad hoc on-demand multipath routing protocol called Link Reliable Multipath Routing (LRMR) protocol. It finds multiple link reliable paths between any source and destination pair for data transmission using two metrics such as Path Length and Path-Link Quality Estimator (P-LQE). We evaluate the performance of LRMR using NS 2.34 with varying network flows under random waypoint mobility model and compare it with AOMDV routing protocol in terms of Quality of Service (QoS) requirements. The LRMR reduces 9% of routing overhead, 18% of packet loss ratio, 13% of normalized routing overhead and 7% of energy consumption than AOMDV routing protocol. It also increases 9% of packet delivery ratio and 2% of throughput than AOMDV routing protocol. From our simulation results, we show that the LRMR protocol outperforms AOMDV routing protocol.

show abstract

Section: A Environmental Setupmentioning

confidence: 99%

Link reliable multipath routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks

Periyasamy¹,

Karthikeyan²

2015

2015 International Conference on Circuits, Power and Computing Technologies [ICCPCT-2015]

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…P.Periyasamy[21] presented a survey on three categories of multipath routing protocols along with their comparison. In[22] P.Periyasamy et al compare the performance of various existing routing protocols like AOMDV, OLSR and ZRP with different network scenarios. The network scenarios are created from various well known mobility models.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

An Analysis of Link Disjoint and Node Disjoint Multipath Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Network

Das¹,

Lobiyal²,

Katti³

2016

IJCNIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Mobile Ad hoc Network, path between source and destination node changes too frequently due to unpredictable behavior and movement of mobile nodes. The data delivery to the intended destination becomes very challenging. The paths exist between source and destination node may be various types. Data delivery may be done with single or multiple paths. Single path sometimes not guaranteed about data delivery, so one of the better solution is multipath data delivery. Here, in this paper, we have considered Link Disjoint and Node Disjoint multipath for data delivery. For this AOMDV protocol with node and link disjoint is considered to evaluate performance. To evaluate their performance different node pause time considered with varying number of nodes. We have computed various QoS network metrics like throughput, average end-to-end delay, routing overhead to identify in which method of data delivery perform better and in what conditions. The results obtain shows that Node Disjoint multipath method AOMDV performs better than Link Disjoint method. The simulation work carried out using Simulator NS-2.34.

show abstract

“…Analyzing minimum cost multicast trees in ad hoc networks was explained in [5]. All these multicasting and broadcasting techniques on MANET [6,22] with different routing algorithms [31] use crisp dataset and generate point estimated result, without considering real-life uncertain constraints. Here the fuzzy system is a most appropriate tool to deal with such uncertainties.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving the Performance of Fuzzy Minimum Spanning Tree based Routing Process through P-Node Fuzzy Multicasting Approach in MANET

Bandyopadhyay¹,

Polytechnic²,

Karforma³

2018

IJCNIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is mostly decentralized and self-adjustable network system. It is significant to optimize the overall network energy utilization and improve packet sending performance by reducing the errors, generated due to different real-life environmental effects. In this paper, considering atmospheric, environmental change and varying distance for topological change, we try to generate the routing cost. By introducing m-minimum (membership value as m) triangular fuzzy number at interval based cost and energy of the network, we try to handle the uncertain environment. Here we generate both fuzzy minimum spanning tree (FMST) for a given n-nodes network and p-node fuzzy multicast minimum spanning tree (pFMMST), in fuzzy interval based format. Applying the fuzzy credibility distribution we modify the network routing cost and energy utilization for both FMST and pFMMST. Comparing the routing cost and residual energy for FMST and pFMMST of MANET, it is concluded that, pFMMST is better FMST based packet routing approach, with minimum routing cost, optimized total energy utilization and best possible technique to reduce the error which is generated due to the deviation of interval of upper and lower limit data in route cost and residual energy.

show abstract

Performance Comparison and Evaluation of Different Multipath Routing Protocols Based on Various Scenario and Traffic Patterns for Mobile AD Hoc Networks

Cited by 5 publications

References 12 publications

Link reliable multipath routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks

Link reliable multipath routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks

An Analysis of Link Disjoint and Node Disjoint Multipath Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Network

Improving the Performance of Fuzzy Minimum Spanning Tree based Routing Process through P-Node Fuzzy Multicasting Approach in MANET

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About