2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-020-02313-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison and design of an optimal polycentric knee mechanism

Abstract: In the present work, several mechanisms of four bars for knee prosthesis were studied and evaluated. We compared and defined the design parameters as well as an optimization method in terms of their stability and voluntary control to get a new mechanism. Few methods have been published to compare the performance and design parameters of the wide variety of polycentric knee mechanisms. In this work, we developed a method for performance comparison of polycentric knee mechanisms and designing a stable and novel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the data in the references regarding the structure, actuation, and control of the prosthetic knee joint are quantitatively analyzed in depth. Because the structural parameters, actuation parameters, and control parameters of the prosthetic knee joint in each reference are not uniform, and the implementation schemes and effects of various prosthetic knee joints are also different, this paper adopted some typical comparative analysis method [67][68][69] and evaluated the performance indices of the introduced structures, actuation, and control of the prosthetic knee joint.…”
Section: Development Status Of the Robotic Knee Prosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the data in the references regarding the structure, actuation, and control of the prosthetic knee joint are quantitatively analyzed in depth. Because the structural parameters, actuation parameters, and control parameters of the prosthetic knee joint in each reference are not uniform, and the implementation schemes and effects of various prosthetic knee joints are also different, this paper adopted some typical comparative analysis method [67][68][69] and evaluated the performance indices of the introduced structures, actuation, and control of the prosthetic knee joint.…”
Section: Development Status Of the Robotic Knee Prosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a new passive polycentric knee was proposed in [6], which was designed by a method for performance comparison of commercial knees. [7] introduced a new four-bar knee with optimizing design parameters by genetic algorithm. Though passive knees are simple and robust, they are incapable of providing net-positive energy for torque-demanding activities like going upstairs and sit-to-stand [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the unique mechanical design, the Utah Hybrid Knee weighed 1.68 kg which is close to the microprocessor-controlled knee and lighter than the fully active knee. Moreover, the RIC Hy- MIT CSEA Knee [9] Vanderbilt Gen. 3 Knee [10] Open-Source Knee [11] Michigan Knee [12] Ossur POWER KNEE TM Utah Hybrid Knee [15] RIC Knee [16] Polycentric Ossur Total Knee Blatchford KX06 Anand et al [6] Soriano et al [7] Geng et al [13] Our PHKP Knee brid Knee [16] is proposed, with a motorized clutch transition mechanism, and preliminary experiments were carried out by an able-bodied subject using a bypass orthosis. However, the Utah Hybrid Knee and RCI Knee are single-axis structural joints with relatively poor stability in stance and low toe clearance in swing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Review articles about passive knees concentrate on polycentric mechanisms and structure optimization. The design, modeling, kinematics, and stability of a knee that was based on a four-bar linkage have been a main topic of prosthesis research for the past decade ( Andrysek, 2010 ; Amador et al, 2011 ; Anand and Sujatha, 2017 ; Andrysek et al, 2019 ; Mohanty et al, 2020 ; Soriano et al, 2020 ). Microprocessor-controlled knees (MPKs) can automatically adjust damping characteristics through external sensors and servo valves, which provide a wider range of self-selected speeds and augmented stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%