1985
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(85)90330-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance characteristics of the anaerobic baffled reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
8

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
70
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The baffled reactor can be regarded as a number of UASB reactors in series. Bachmann et al (1985) used this approach combined with a fixed-film model to simulate an ABR. Grobicki and Stuckey (1992) performed residence time distribution studies on both clean and working ABRs and concluded that the hydraulic flow may be characterized by a number of theoretical perfectly mixed reactors in series.…”
Section: Q2s2xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baffled reactor can be regarded as a number of UASB reactors in series. Bachmann et al (1985) used this approach combined with a fixed-film model to simulate an ABR. Grobicki and Stuckey (1992) performed residence time distribution studies on both clean and working ABRs and concluded that the hydraulic flow may be characterized by a number of theoretical perfectly mixed reactors in series.…”
Section: Q2s2xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower parts of the hanging baffles were angled at 45° to evenly direct the flow into the center of the upflow chamber. This configuration facilitated effective mixing and contact between the wastewater and anaerobic sludge at the base of each upflow chamber [10]. Each compartment was equipped with sampling ports that allowed biological solids, gas, and liquid samples to be withdrawn.…”
Section: Experimental Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also found that the addition of a recycle stream alleviated the problems of low pH caused by high levels of VFA at the front of the reactor, and discouraged gelatinous bacterial growth at the reactor inlet for the treatment of complex protein carbohydrate wastewater (Bachmann et al, 1983). Recycle was also reported to benefit the ABR through dilution of toxicants in the influent (Bachmann et al, 1985;Grobicki and Stuckey, 1991). On the other hand Grobicki and Stuckey (1992) and Nachaiyasit (1995) noted that with non-granular biomass, recycle had a negative effect caused by increased mixing which encouraged solids loss, and disrupted symbiotic relationships (Henze and Harremoës, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%