2005
DOI: 10.1080/1612197x.2005.9671757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance calibration in sport: Implications for self‐confidence and metacognitive biases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been supported that younger students typically overestimate how much they can remember or learn, whereas older students' estimates of memory and learning are much closer to their actual performance on academic tasks (Lan, 2005). In the sport domain, this tendency was more evident in more difficult tasks (Fogarty & Else, 2005;Fogarty & Ross, 2007). Students' limited ability to accurately discriminate performance could be attributed to various reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been supported that younger students typically overestimate how much they can remember or learn, whereas older students' estimates of memory and learning are much closer to their actual performance on academic tasks (Lan, 2005). In the sport domain, this tendency was more evident in more difficult tasks (Fogarty & Else, 2005;Fogarty & Ross, 2007). Students' limited ability to accurately discriminate performance could be attributed to various reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the sport domain, adult tennis players (Fogarty & Ross, 2007) and golfers (Fogarty & Else, 2005) predicted accurately their performance on easier tasks and were overconfident on more difficult tasks. However, these studies examined students' predictions regarding forthcoming performance and not students' performance evaluations in a task that they had executed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sport settings, only a few studies have examined performance calibration. Golfers were well calibrated on easier tasks (putting) but overconfident on more difficult tasks (chipping and pitching) ( Fogarty & Else, 2005 ), and recreational basketball players overestimated their shooting performance ( McGraw, Mellers, & Ritov, 2004 ). In physical education, students were generally overconfident regarding their basketball dribbling performance ( Kolovelonis, Goudas, & Dermitzaki, 2012 ), and performance calibration did not differ between students who practiced dribbling receiving social feedback and setting process or performance goals and control group students ( Kolovelonis, Goudas, Dermitzaki, & Kitsantas, 2013 ).…”
Section: Calibration Of Performance: Conceptualization and Research Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on these domains has focused on exploring the underlying mechanisms involved in metacognitive monitoring and the factors contributing in the discrepancy between estimated and actual performance. Such research regarding aspects of metacognition including the accuracy of performance estimations has also recently emerged in sport (e.g., Fogarty & Else, 2005 ) and physical education (e.g., Kolovelonis & Goudas, 2018 ) settings. The present study followed and expanded this trend focusing on the interactions between students’ estimation of their own and their peers’ performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance estimates in the field of sports may help athletes to assess their performances, know about their abilities and determine their targets more comfortably. Participants' judged and actual performances were compared in different sportive activities such as golf shots (Fogarty & Else, 2005), free shots of recreational basketball players (McGraw, Mellers, & Ritov, 2004), dart shots (Gasser & Tan, 2005) and students' free basketball shots (Kolovelonis & Goudas, 2018). Since metacognitive judgments might demonstrate stable trait-like characteristics (Pieschl, 2009), person related characteristics may also be effective in individual differences in calibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%