Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information
SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)
U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel CommandFort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5012
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)
DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
ABSTRACTAs the Alzheimer's disease field moves to studies and intervention trials in the preclinical phase and early prodromal period, it will be necessary to measure everyday function in an increasingly more sensitive and sophisticated way to capture more subtle impairments. One approach to increasing sensitivity in functional measures is to use performance based instruments, such as the UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA), in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. In this test patients are observed and their response scored as they actually perform proxies for real world tasks and it contrasts with more typical informant based measures. In a preliminary study we compared patients with MCI, patients with mild AD who by diagnosis have functional impairments, and healthy age matched controls on the UPSA, as well as measures of cognition (e.g., episodic memory, semantic memory, executive function, speed). We found that patients with MCI had compromises in everyday functional competence and that the UPSA was strikingly sensitive to these (Goldberg et al, 2010). Additionally the UPSA outperformed an informant based measure on a variety of criteria.However, that study was not longitudinal. Therefore, it is important that we obtain data on the longitudinal characteristics of the UPSA in these populations, including the severity of decline in this measure over time, the relationship of decline to cognitive changes in order to determine the validity of the UPSA, and its technical psychometric characteristics (e.g., test-retest reliability).In the present longitudinal study we found large between group differences on the UPSA, such that HCs outperformed MCI individuals,
SUBJECT TERMSAlzheimer's disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment, functional impairment, UPSA Supporting data page 7Appendix I page 12Page 4 of 12
AbstractAs the Alzheimer's disease field moves to studies and intervention trials in the preclinical phase and early prodromal period, it will be necessary to measure everyday function in an increasingly more sensitive and sophisticated way to capture more subtle impairments. One approach to increasing sensitivity in functional measures is to use...