2012
DOI: 10.21236/ada573289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Assessment of the Three-Dimensional Wind Field Weather Running Estimate - Nowcast and the Three-Dimensional Wind Field Air Force Weather Agency Weather Research and Forecasting Wind Forecasts

Abstract: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including sugges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While MET proved useful as an assessment tool for forecasts over a regional domain, they found its ability to illuminate model shortcomings on the spatial and temporal scales needed by battlefield commanders to be lacking. In another assessment Dumais et al (2012) evaluated 3 models that produced 3-dimensional (3-D) wind fields to arrive at domain-level conclusions. Although Dumais et al did not employ any of the MET in their analysis, their desire was to also identify model strengths and weaknesses, and again, they found their ability to draw spatial and temporal conclusions lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While MET proved useful as an assessment tool for forecasts over a regional domain, they found its ability to illuminate model shortcomings on the spatial and temporal scales needed by battlefield commanders to be lacking. In another assessment Dumais et al (2012) evaluated 3 models that produced 3-dimensional (3-D) wind fields to arrive at domain-level conclusions. Although Dumais et al did not employ any of the MET in their analysis, their desire was to also identify model strengths and weaknesses, and again, they found their ability to draw spatial and temporal conclusions lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%