2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-020-09906-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance assessment of the metaheuristic optimization algorithms: an exhaustive review

Abstract: The simulation-driven metaheuristic algorithms have been successful in solving numerous problems compared to their deterministic counterparts. Despite this advantage, the stochastic nature of such algorithms resulted in a spectrum of solutions by a certain number of trials that may lead to the uncertainty of quality solutions. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to use a correct tool for measuring the performance of the diverse set of metaheuristic algorithms to derive an appropriate judgment on the superior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 229 publications
(252 reference statements)
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In future work, it would be prudent to improve and develop MOBO using vector-valued GPs with high noise observations and the weight adaptation method to accommodate complex PF shapes. Regarding the performance metrics in cases of complex PF shapes, we think that in addition to Loss and IGD metrics, various metrics [12] need to more precisely quantify the performance of algorithms [9]. In addition, real experiments would be desirable to confirm the effectiveness of combining random scalarizations and vector-valued GPs in materials discovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future work, it would be prudent to improve and develop MOBO using vector-valued GPs with high noise observations and the weight adaptation method to accommodate complex PF shapes. Regarding the performance metrics in cases of complex PF shapes, we think that in addition to Loss and IGD metrics, various metrics [12] need to more precisely quantify the performance of algorithms [9]. In addition, real experiments would be desirable to confirm the effectiveness of combining random scalarizations and vector-valued GPs in materials discovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choosing the better method among the competitors is very important for practical users, even though various approaches to the problem of comparison between metaheuristics are still debated in the literature (Garcia and Herrera 2008 ; Crepinsek et al 2016 ; Hussain et al 2019 ; Halim et al 2021 ). In the majority of papers in which DE or PSO are used to solve COVID-19 related problems, only one variant of a single optimization method is used.…”
Section: Methodological Aspects Of Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this paper would not impart an exhaustive review of them here. However, reference [14] comprehensively assesses both single-and multi-objective algorithms and proffers a reliable overview of the current metaheuristics state.…”
Section: Optimizermentioning
confidence: 99%