2015
DOI: 10.3390/coatings5010003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Assessment of Low-Noise Road Surfaces in the Leopoldo Project: Comparison and Validation of Different Measurement Methods

Abstract: In almost all urban contexts and in many extra-urban conurbations, where road traffic is the main noise pollution source, the use of barriers is not allowed. In these cases, low-noise road surfaces are the most used mitigation action together with traffic flow reduction. Selecting the optimal surface is only the first problem that the public administration has to face. In the second place, it has to consider the issue of assessing the efficacy of the mitigation action. The purpose of the LEOPOLDO project was t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first rubberized surface here analyzed is one of the experimental pavements laid within the LEOPOLDO project [30]. This experimental surface is a gap graded 0/8 with a bitumen mixture modified by the addition of rubber crumb recycled from scrap tires, through the wet process [31].…”
Section: A Case Study: the Leopoldo Project Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first rubberized surface here analyzed is one of the experimental pavements laid within the LEOPOLDO project [30]. This experimental surface is a gap graded 0/8 with a bitumen mixture modified by the addition of rubber crumb recycled from scrap tires, through the wet process [31].…”
Section: A Case Study: the Leopoldo Project Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPB measurements include not only all vehicle noise sources and the efect of all propagation mechanisms, but also include other acoustic information near the measurement. For the evaluation of roadside noise through the SPB method, unreliable results due to the inluence of surrounding conditions, even using a modiied procedure, have been reported [36]. Records with head and torso simulator are in reality the SPB measurements, having precisely the same problems Figure . For annoyance or vehicle detection tasks, noise measurements contaminated with undesired sounds are an impediment to adequately accomplishing the task.…”
Section: Noise Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this relation has not been used in this research work due to some reasons that are given below: SPB and CPB methods highly depend on the section where measurements are carried out. The microphones must be located in an acoustic free field (see for instance Tonin [23], Licitra [24] or Sandberg [10]), however, some of the sections studied in this work cannot be considered as free field.…”
Section: Environmental Noise Levels From Close Proximity (Cpx) Noise mentioning
confidence: 99%