2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance assessment of construction companies: A study of factors promoting financial soundness and innovation in the industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of best practice do exist in the UK but are rare, for example Plummerswood and the Glencoe visitor centre in Scotland were constructed with low energy and resource use, design-for-deconstruction and reuse principles in mind (Passivhaus Trust, 2012;SC-Arch, 2002;WRAP, 2014). A performance assessment of the Portuguese construction industry concluded that small, specialised companies and large contractors tend to achieve the best performance levels, and this may be linked to innovativeness (Horta et al, 2012). This supports a view that typical (non-specialist) small and mediumsized enterprises, which make up the majority of the construction industry, may struggle to drive innovative practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Examples of best practice do exist in the UK but are rare, for example Plummerswood and the Glencoe visitor centre in Scotland were constructed with low energy and resource use, design-for-deconstruction and reuse principles in mind (Passivhaus Trust, 2012;SC-Arch, 2002;WRAP, 2014). A performance assessment of the Portuguese construction industry concluded that small, specialised companies and large contractors tend to achieve the best performance levels, and this may be linked to innovativeness (Horta et al, 2012). This supports a view that typical (non-specialist) small and mediumsized enterprises, which make up the majority of the construction industry, may struggle to drive innovative practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In addition, in general, previous literature on construction industry efficiency has tended to report relatively large inefficiency values for this sector (see, e.g., Pilateris and McCabe 2003;Horta et al 2012;Kapelko et al 2014;Kapelko and Oude Lansink 2015a).…”
Section: Overall and Input-specific Technical And Scale Inefficienciesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous studies of the construction sector have analyzed inefficiency measures for all inputs employed simultaneously, without distinguishing the contribution of each input to overall firms' performance. Those relate to construction companies in Spain (Kapelko et al 2014;Kapelko and Oude Lansink 2015a), Portugal (Horta et al 2012), Iran (Wong et al 2012), Canada (Pilateris and McCabe 2003), Greece (Tsolas 2011), Footnote 2 continued context by Kapelko and Oude Lansink (2017) with application to the measurement of input-specific dynamic inefficiency of European dairy manufacturing firms. 3 There is also an important stream of research that analyzes the input-specific productivity evolution over time; this includes Mahlberg andSahoo (2011), Chang et al (2012) and Kapelko et al (2015b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly we selected the economic profitability (EP) measured as the ratio between the gross annual profit and the total assets included in the balance sheet of each PPP company. This variable is objective, measurable, available for every project and has been used before by several authors (Horta, Camanho, & Moreira Da Costa, 2012;Kangari, Farid, & Elgharib, 1992).…”
Section: Selecting the Variables Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%