2018
DOI: 10.1002/mp.13192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance assessment of active vs passive pixel x‐ray angiography detector systems using a bias‐corrected channelized Hotelling observer and adult patient‐equivalent experimental conditions

Abstract: Purpose Electronic noise associated with passive pixel (PP) x‐ray angiography flat panel detectors is known to compromise fluoroscopic image quality. An active pixel (AP) crystalline silicon x‐ray detector with potential for reduced influence of electronic noise is commercially available. The purpose of this work was to compare the performance of the AP vs PP x‐ray angiography detectors over a detector target dose (DTD) range relevant for invasive cardiology procedures. Methods A total of 16 passive pixel dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our clinical practice, images are routinely rescaled from the “native” pixel matrix of the detector to 512 × 512 8 bit matrices for retrospective review and archival. Previous work demonstrated that d ′ estimates from 512 × 512 8 bit images were 4% lower than those based on the native pixel matrix 35 . To mimic the clinical practice and to minimize computational resources, 512 × 512 8 bit images were exported from the angiography system and used to estimate d ′ in this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In our clinical practice, images are routinely rescaled from the “native” pixel matrix of the detector to 512 × 512 8 bit matrices for retrospective review and archival. Previous work demonstrated that d ′ estimates from 512 × 512 8 bit images were 4% lower than those based on the native pixel matrix 35 . To mimic the clinical practice and to minimize computational resources, 512 × 512 8 bit images were exported from the angiography system and used to estimate d ′ in this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when comparing passive vs active pixel detector technologies at low exposure imaging conditions, d 0 bias due to TVNS noise is larger for the former. 35 This is mainly due to the reduced electronic noise achievable in active pixel detectors.…”
Section: B Bias From Temporally Variable Nonstationary Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations