2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-018-02190-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance assessment of a cross-validation sampling strategy with active surrogate model selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the training phase, machine learning algorithms commonly use cross‐validation techniques to gain higher accuracy. The use of cross‐validation during the training phase is computationally expensive (Garbo & German, 2019; Kang, Qin, Lee, & Lee, 2019). To speed up the training process, 20% of data from each batch is allocated as test instances.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the training phase, machine learning algorithms commonly use cross‐validation techniques to gain higher accuracy. The use of cross‐validation during the training phase is computationally expensive (Garbo & German, 2019; Kang, Qin, Lee, & Lee, 2019). To speed up the training process, 20% of data from each batch is allocated as test instances.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…409). Shu et al (2018) also uses LOO-CV to select the next point to be simulated; that LOO-CV measures the metamodel accuracy through either the root mean squared prediction error (RMSPE) de…ned in (11) below or the maximum absolute error (MAE) instead of our measure de…ned in (10); Garbo and German (2019) also uses LOO-CV with the MSPE (the square of the RMSPE) to select the next point. Rasmussen and Williams (2006) discusses LOO-CV within a Bayesian framework.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five individual surrogate models, namely, the KRG (gauss), KRG (exp), RBF (tps), RBF (mq) and PRS (degree2) models, were employed as the initial candidate models (Garbo and German, 2019) (Wang et al, 2014a), the size of the population NP in the PSO model was set to 20D, where D is the dimension of the problem. The maximum allowed number of generations was set to 100 in Problems 1-4, and that in the other problems was set to 300.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of the Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five individual surrogate models, namely, the KRG (gauss), KRG (exp), RBF (tps), RBF (mq) and PRS (degree2) models, were employed as the initial candidate models (Garbo and German, 2019). KRG(gauss) means that the correlation function in the Kriging model is a Gaussian function.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation