2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32205-1_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and Robustness Analysis for Some Re-sampling Detection Techniques in Digital Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate robustness, the aforementioned detection techniques were tested under several simple postprocessing operations, such as Gaussian noise addition or JPEG compression. Recently, some authors [6,7] designed testing frameworks to evaluate and compare the robustness of different resampling detectors. With the aim to assess the security of resampling detection, Kirchner and Boehme [8] designed several targeted attacks against the technique of Popescu and Farid [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate robustness, the aforementioned detection techniques were tested under several simple postprocessing operations, such as Gaussian noise addition or JPEG compression. Recently, some authors [6,7] designed testing frameworks to evaluate and compare the robustness of different resampling detectors. With the aim to assess the security of resampling detection, Kirchner and Boehme [8] designed several targeted attacks against the technique of Popescu and Farid [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%