Performance and reproducibility on shuttle run test between obese and non-obese children: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

BackgroundDue to the increasing prevalence of obesity among children, Shuttle Run Test (SRT) has been used as primary outcome for assessment of both physical performance and responses to different physical training programs. Thus, this study aimed to compare the performance on SRT between obese and non-obese children and the reproducibility of two SRTs carried out on different days.MethodsA cross-sectional study in which 40 children, aged from 8 to 10, were recruited from a public school. This study consisted of three visits in each school. On the first visit, we carried out a medical screening for recruited children. On the second visit, we applied the first SRT (SRT1), which was repeated on the third visit (SRT2, 24 hours apart).ResultsThere was a significant difference in the distance traveled by non-obese in comparison with obese children (mean difference: 88 meters and 95% of confidence interval: 21 meters to 156 meters). Time and distance traveled of 27 children were higher in the SRT1, whereas nine children traveled a greater distance and presented higher testing time on the SRT2, with only four children showing the same distance traveled in both tests. Although both groups presented with reduction from the SRT1 to SRT2, this reduction was not significant (non-obese: 342 ± 97 meters to 319 ± 106 meters, respectively; obese: 269 ± 91 meters to 246 ± 90 meters, respectively). In obese children, the distance traveled in the best SRT had correlation with weight (r = -0.495, p = 0.043) and BMI (r = - 0.602, p = 0.011). No correlation was observed in the non-obese children.ConclusionsOverweight children had lower performance in SRT. Although reproducible, the best performance was in the first test, which leads us to suggest applying only one test.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-017-0825-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Heart rate agreement between the 20-meter shuttle run test and virtual system in healthy children: a cross-sectional study

“…The children were verbally encouraged during each stage using standard phrases such as “you’re doing really well” and “keep going” in a clear loud voice to guarantee total comprehension. The completed stages were converted into meters [21, 29].…”

Differences in blood pressure according to physical fitness and body mass in a sample of Mexican schoolchildren

“…Although the association of flexibility with BMI has been inconsistent 21,22 , a negative correlation of BMI with CRF 7,8,21,23 and muscular strength and endurance 21,24,25 has been systematically observed in pediatric populations. Some of the characteristics of children with overweight or obesity, such as a tendency to a more sedentary lifestyle 26 , to experience fatigue faster 27 , and to present lower performance in aerobic tests 28 can explain these differences. Furthermore, they perceive more difficulty with several activities of daily living 29 , and these difficulties may limit their performance during fitness tests because they face unfamiliar situations such as effort exertion, muscle fatigue, and discomfort.…”

Virtual System can be considered interchangeable with shuttle run in healthy children: a cross-sectional study

“…The children were instructed to complete as many stages as possible. The test was stopped when the child was no longer able to reach within three meters of the 20-meter line at the time of the radio signal 30 . The shuttle run test was conducted on a flat surface at the multi-sport courts of the schools.…”