2015 IEEE 17th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, 2015 IEEE 7th International Symposium 2015
DOI: 10.1109/hpcc-css-icess.2015.68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and Power Analysis of High-Density Multi-GPGPU Architectures: A Preliminary Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost all of these packages are capable of performing multithreading, GPU acceleration, and parallel computation with conventional integration methods such as velocity Verlet and leap-frog, and different methods of long-range calculation, energy minimization, free-energy calculation, temperature, and pressure control. Many studies have compared different MD software products using different test systems, benchmarks, and hardware [88,89]. Comparing GROMACS, LAMMPS, CHARMM, and NAMD with five protein systems from 20,000 to 3 million atoms as test systems found GROMACS to be faster for all of the tested systems sizes while GROMACS, LAMMPS, and NAMD showed similar scaling behavior for larger systems [89].…”
Section: Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all of these packages are capable of performing multithreading, GPU acceleration, and parallel computation with conventional integration methods such as velocity Verlet and leap-frog, and different methods of long-range calculation, energy minimization, free-energy calculation, temperature, and pressure control. Many studies have compared different MD software products using different test systems, benchmarks, and hardware [88,89]. Comparing GROMACS, LAMMPS, CHARMM, and NAMD with five protein systems from 20,000 to 3 million atoms as test systems found GROMACS to be faster for all of the tested systems sizes while GROMACS, LAMMPS, and NAMD showed similar scaling behavior for larger systems [89].…”
Section: Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the other research focus is enhancing the security guarantee level to prevent users' data from malicious attacks . Prior researches have addressed this issue from a few perspectives, such as proactive threats detection , sensor‐oriented protection , malicious behavior analyses , and system architecture reinforcements . It has been proved that using redundancy‐based fault‐tolerant cache structure could be an approach for increasing security levels in cloud systems .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the number of users gets really large, over the limit of the thread number, we can use a grid of processors such as Graphic Processing Unit Table (GPU) to automatically accommodate the increase of usage loads. Examples of this line of work are given in [9,10]. We will use such technologies in our production environment of the RN-chatter server.…”
Section: Application: Rn-chattermentioning
confidence: 99%